<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Staying Away From Dontrelle Willis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://districtondeck.com/2012/03/20/staying-away-from-dontrelle-willis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://districtondeck.com/2012/03/20/staying-away-from-dontrelle-willis/</link>
	<description>A Washington Nationals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 69NatsFan</title>
		<link>http://districtondeck.com/2012/03/20/staying-away-from-dontrelle-willis/comment-page-1/#comment-1368617</link>
		<dc:creator>69NatsFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://districtondeck.com/?p=3149#comment-1368617</guid>
		<description>kkolchak -- True, the Nats signed Perez last year, so thank&#039;s for correcting my mistake. I also agree with you that the Nats are far past &quot;dumpster diving&quot;, but many sports fans in the area who do not follow the team as closely as we do, still have that perception of the club -- I hear it in nearly every conversation I have with those folks. Just some examples -- one said to me, &quot;It&#039;s a shame the Nats are losing more games and drawing way fewer fans than the Orioles are (huh?); do you think the Nats will go after a lot of Rule 5 picks since they are a small market team?; When will the Nats move out of RFK? -- (asked last year!).

I only wish I were making this up. So, when I weigh the possible benefit of signing Willis with the tangible cost of continuing this perception, I think it matters. I agree with you that all appearances become irrelevant and interest spikes if and when the Nationals become a winner. But until they do, things that feed this monster don&#039;t help. I also agree with your 6th starter/long reliever point. Wish I had added that to my case.

Thanks for commenting. I must also add that Michael presented a strong case and almost won me over -- he did, I guess, convince Dan Duquette!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kkolchak &#8212; True, the Nats signed Perez last year, so thank&#8217;s for correcting my mistake. I also agree with you that the Nats are far past &#8220;dumpster diving&#8221;, but many sports fans in the area who do not follow the team as closely as we do, still have that perception of the club &#8212; I hear it in nearly every conversation I have with those folks. Just some examples &#8212; one said to me, &#8220;It&#8217;s a shame the Nats are losing more games and drawing way fewer fans than the Orioles are (huh?); do you think the Nats will go after a lot of Rule 5 picks since they are a small market team?; When will the Nats move out of RFK? &#8212; (asked last year!).</p>
<p>I only wish I were making this up. So, when I weigh the possible benefit of signing Willis with the tangible cost of continuing this perception, I think it matters. I agree with you that all appearances become irrelevant and interest spikes if and when the Nationals become a winner. But until they do, things that feed this monster don&#8217;t help. I also agree with your 6th starter/long reliever point. Wish I had added that to my case.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting. I must also add that Michael presented a strong case and almost won me over &#8212; he did, I guess, convince Dan Duquette!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kkolchack</title>
		<link>http://districtondeck.com/2012/03/20/staying-away-from-dontrelle-willis/comment-page-1/#comment-1368616</link>
		<dc:creator>kkolchack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://districtondeck.com/?p=3149#comment-1368616</guid>
		<description>First of all, the Perez signing was just last year, not &quot;a few years ago.&quot;  Secondly, the concern about &quot;dumpster diving&quot; is way overwrought.  The Zimmerman and Gio extensions, Strasburg and Harper signings and Werh&#039;s silly contract put an end to all of that.  If Willis could conceivably help the team down the stretch this year, they should sign him, appearances be damned.
 
A much better argument AGAINST signing him is that we now have plenty of 6th starter/long reliever type lefties in the organization and don&#039;t really need him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, the Perez signing was just last year, not &#8220;a few years ago.&#8221;  Secondly, the concern about &#8220;dumpster diving&#8221; is way overwrought.  The Zimmerman and Gio extensions, Strasburg and Harper signings and Werh&#8217;s silly contract put an end to all of that.  If Willis could conceivably help the team down the stretch this year, they should sign him, appearances be damned.<br />
 <br />
A much better argument AGAINST signing him is that we now have plenty of 6th starter/long reliever type lefties in the organization and don&#8217;t really need him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 25/31 queries in 0.073 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 313/343 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: districtondeck.com @ 2013-06-19 13:05:29 by W3 Total Cache -->